Combined acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and quaternary ammonium antimuscarinic therapy to alter progression of cognitive diseases

ABSTRACT

A method administers quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonists in combination with acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors to treat either cognitive impairment or acute delirium. This therapy results in a modification of a cognitive disorder or disease, namely a slow down in the disease progression. In one preferred embodiment, the disease is dementia with Lewy Bodies. New formulations for quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonists are also disclosed.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part application of co-pendingapplication Ser. No. 13/325,371, filed Dec. 14, 2011, entitled “NEW USESFOR QUATERNARY AMMONIUM ANTICHOLINERGIC MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTSIN PATIENTS BEING TREATED FOR COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT OR ACUTE DELIRIUM”which is a divisional patent application of application Ser. No.11/935,483, filed Nov. 6, 2007, entitled “NEW USES FOR QUATERNARYAMMONIUM ANTICHOLINERGIC MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS IN PATIENTSBEING TREATED FOR COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT OR ACUTE DELIRIUM”, now U.S. Pat.No. 8,097,633, issued Jan. 17, 2012, which claims one or more inventionswhich were disclosed in Provisional Application No. 60/865,893, filedNov. 15, 2006, entitled “Use of Glycopyrrolate to Remedy Incontinence inPatients Being Treated For Cognitive Impairment or Acute Dementia”. Thebenefit under 35 USC §119(e) of the United States provisionalapplication is hereby claimed, and the aforementioned applications arehereby incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention pertains to the field of treating patients suffering fromvarious cognitive disorders. More particularly, the invention pertainsto improvements in cognitive function in patients treated withacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Neurodegenerative diseases impart costs on individuals and society interms of loss of function, costs of care, and the personal loss ofidentity associated with pain and suffering. Such diseases or cognitivedisorders include, but are not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Dementiawith Lewy Body, Parkinson's Disease, and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

Cognitive impairment is a serious neurological condition which is verycommon in the elderly. It is estimated that approximately one-third ofpeople who live to be over 80 years of age will be diagnosed with someform of cognitive impairment, or dementia. Cognitive impairment canresult from a variety of disease processes, such as, but not limited to:

Neurodegenerative dementia:

-   -   Alzheimer's Disease    -   Pick's Disease    -   Progressive Supranuclear Palsy    -   Dementia with Lewy Bodies    -   Parkinson's Disease    -   Fronto-temporal Dementia

Vascular Diseases:

-   -   Stroke    -   Multi-infarct dementia    -   Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Head Trauma

Infections:

-   -   Post-encephalitic dementia    -   Syphilis    -   Herpetic encephalitis

Congenital abnormalities:

-   -   Trisomy 21

Toxic Brain Injuries:

-   -   Wernike Encephalopathy    -   Krorsakoff psychosis    -   Alcoholic amnesic syndrome    -   Alcoholic dementia

The primary result of this general condition is a universal decline inthe intellectual function of the individual, usually resulting insignificant impediments to normal daily functions. While there iscurrently no disease modifying therapy available for most forms ofcognitive impairment, certain treatments are available to treat thesymptoms and improve cognitive functioning to varying degrees, which canalleviate or at least delay the need for institutionalizing theseindividuals.

It has been determined that the decline of the neurotransmitter chemicalacetylcholine in the brain is one of the primary mechanisms of decliningmental function. Medications that can prevent or at least minimize thebreakdown of acetylcholine in the brain provide significant improvementin the cognitive abilities of patients diagnosed with cognitiveimpairment. These medications are commonly referred to asacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors. However, as with any medication, thereare side effects. For example, acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitorsexacerbate urinary and fecal incontinence in patients administered thesedrugs. Other side effects include a reduced heart rate, sweating,vasodilation and increased bronchial secretions. Such side effects maybe so uncomfortable for many elderly patients that the patient is unableto tolerate effective dosing of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors tosuccessfully treat the cognitive impairment.

Attempts to ameliorate these undesirable side effects in cognitivelyimpaired patients include the administration of, for example,antimuscarinic anti-cholinergic drugs (commonly called“anti-muscarinics”). These drugs block the peripheral stimulation of theacetylcholine receptors. Unfortunately, however, the use of thesemedications to treat the side effects of acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitors mentioned previously often contribute to cognitiveimpairment, which is what is being treated by the acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitor in the first place. Thus, benefits of using these drugs mustbe balanced with the risks of exacerbating the existing cognitiveimpairment. As a result, many patients are either inadequately treatedor go untreated.

Over the years, researchers have studied the cognitive effects ofanti-cholinergic drugs and have found that anti-cholinergic muscarinicdrugs cause cognitive decline in the elderly and further cognitivedecline in those already impaired. In fact, many practitioners refer tothe dilemma regarding treatment of impairments in cognitive function incombination with incontinence as choosing between “your brain versusyour bladder”. When prescribing medications, a practitioner has to workwith their patients and their families and often decide whether to treatthe incontinence caused by the medications being used to try to improvecognitive function, which would result in further detriment of cognitivefunction, or instead rely on alternative solutions to incontinenceissues (including the often embarrassing use of adult diapers, or eveninstitutionalization of the incontinent patient).

In addition to cognitive impairment, a more severe problem oftenafflicts the elderly and is referred to as acute delirium. The primaryindicators are a pronounced change in mental status that rapidlyfluctuates, the inability to maintain normal degrees of attention,disorganized thinking and vacillating levels of consciousness. Acutedelirium can often result from a severe medical illness, recent surgeryand use of several medications or interactions between variousmedications. The impact of acute delirium on patients is severe andoften chronic, frequently leading to death.

While the neurological mechanism by which acute delirium occurs is notcompletely understood, like cognitive impairment, the neurotransmitteracetylcholine is thought to play a significant role. In patientssuffering from dementia, a decline in acetylcholine has been seen inpost mortem studies. As with treatments for cognitive impairment, theuse of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibiting medications has been determinedto prevent, to varying degrees, the breakdown of acetylcholine in thebrain. However, the undesired side effects outside the central nervoussystem (CNS) that have been discussed above often result. In order tominimize these problems, the administration of drugs that block theperipheral effects of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors act would bedesirable. Unfortunately, in a manner similar to other cognitiveimpairments, anti-cholinergics frequently contribute to the underlyingproblem by causing central nervous system toxicity.

There is thus a severe need to treat patients suffering from variousforms of cognitive impairment as well as those suffering from acutedelirium with an effective amount of medication to minimize or entirelyalleviate these conditions without imposing upon them the undesiredperipheral effects discussed previously, especially urinary and/or fecalincontinence, nausea, bradychardia, bronchorrhea and/or bronchospasmwhich often coexist with these cognitive impairments. The desire is tobe able to administer the most efficacious type and amount of medicationto treat the neurological condition without increasing the unwanted sideeffects of high doses of those medications. This balance has yet to beachieved in modern clinical practice.

There is also a need for treatments that alter the disease progressionof progressive dementias and other cognitive impairments.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method administers quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinicreceptor antagonists in combination with acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitors to treat cognitive impairment and/or acute delirium. Thistherapy results in a modification of the disease, namely a slow down inthe disease progression. In one preferred embodiment, the disease isdementia with Lewy Bodies. In one preferred embodiment, the quaternaryammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist isglycopyrrolate and the acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor is rivastigmine.

The quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonistprevents or substantially ameliorates the undesired side effects ofacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors, which permits the administration ofhigher doses of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors than patients couldotherwise tolerate. The use of the compounds of the invention permitsthe administration of optimum therapeutic dosages ofacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors, thus maximizing the beneficial effectof the therapeutic drugs. Suitable quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergicmuscarinic receptor antagonists include the drugs trospium andglycopyrrolate.

A further embodiment of administering quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonists to patients sufferingfrom cognitive disorders, in general, such as dementia, acute dementiaand dementia with Lewy Bodies, who are also being administered theacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine, results in a markedimprovement in cognitive function, in addition to an improvement incontrolling the adverse effects of excessive acetylcholine including,but not limited to, urinary and/or fecal incontinence, nausea,bradychardia, bronchorrhea and bronchospasm.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows disease progression in a patient, KM, versus expecteddisease progression.

FIG. 2 shows FIG. 1 shows disease progression in a patient, AL, versusexpected disease progression.

FIG. 3 shows disease progression in a patient, RF, versus expecteddisease progression.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All known treatments for dementia and other cognitivedisorders/impairments treat the symptoms; there are currently notreatments that modify of alter the course of the disease. In otherwords, there are no treatments that are able to stop or even slow theprogression of the disease. In addition, the dosages of the treatmentscurrently available are limited by their side effects.

In methods described herein, combination therapies useacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonists to slow the progressionof cognitive disease. These therapies result in disease modification ofneurodegenerative diseases and certain developmental diseases bypharmacologically enhanced cerebrospinal fluid perfusion. Thesetherapies alter the disease progression by slowing the cognitivedeterioration of the patient.

Certain developmental disorders, particularly the Autism SpectrumDisorders, may share a neurodegenerative process, as suggested by theobserved fact that normal development is often interfered with at somepoint after the first year of age. Increasing data suggests thatneurodegenerative processes may reflect impaired clearance of endogenousmolecules from the central nervous system. Suspected molecules includebeta amyloid, alpha synuclein, tau, and numerous modifications of thesemolecules that occur through endogenous metabolic processes.

Despite the development of technologies for early detection ofneurodegenerative processes, such as radio labeled antibodies againstamyloid, the clinical role of such interventions has been limited by thefact that there is no disease modifying treatment available, andjustification for the cost of these diagnostic interventions isdifficult.

At this time, there is no disease modifying therapy available forneurodegenerative, developmental disorders. Anecdotal data has suggestedseveral subjects to seem to have disease remittive effects frompharmacologic intervention, although these do not turn out to besupported in randomized control trials. Randomized controlled trials ofnumerous classes of agents including, but not limited to, antibodiesagainst beta-amyloid, vaccines against beta amyloid, anti-inflammatoryagents, corticosteroids, HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors, angiotensionconverting enzyme inhibitors, ginko biloba, anti-oxidants andmonotherapy with highest tolerated doses of acetylcholinesteraseinhibitors, have been unsuccessful in altering the deterioration ofintellectual function.

Recently described processes for circulation of cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) in the brain may explain the variable experience of patients withslowing, or stabilizing a neurodegenerative process. This includes the“glymphatic” system described as a means for rapid perfusion of thebrain interstitial spaces with CSF (Iliff et al., “A ParavascularPathway Facilitates CSF Flow Through the Brain Parenchyma and theClearance of Interstitial Solutes, Including Amyloid β”. Sci Transl Med,15 Aug. 2012: Vol. 4, Issue 147, p. 147ra111, herein incorporated byreference), and may have identified the potential clearing mechanism.

The lymphatics system of the human body is under neurological controland numerous pharmacological agents have been described that interactwith the lymphatic system, outside of the central nervous system. Manyof these pharmacological agents include commonly used medicines inpatients with neurodegenerative diseases including adrenergic,serotonergic and acetylcholinergic medications. Acetylcholine is knownto induce dilation and enhanced flow of lymphatic pathways in humans.

It is therefore likely that pharmacological agents may influence therate of clearance of potentially toxic molecules from the centralnervous system and that disease processes may represent impairment ofthese clearing mechanisms.

With a particular focus on the acetylcholine system, cholinergicreceptor agonists have been shown to improve lymphatic flow in theperipheral lymphatic system. Despite numerous clinical trials, there isno evidence that monotherapy with acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors atcurrently approved maximal doses alters the course of neurodegenerativedisorders. However, the degree of inhibition of central nervous systemacetyl-cholinesterase achieved with such doses is estimated to be only30-40%.

As of today, disease modification trials in Alzheimer's disease havebeen unsuccessful, and have included trials of medications designed toclear amyloid from the central nervous system using immunologicaltechnology, as well as attempts to slow the production of amyloid. Noclinical studies have focused on enhancement of CSF perfusion as a meansfor enhanced CNS substrate removal.

Combination Therapies for Reducing Side Effects while OptimizingEfficacy

Not all antimuscarinic drugs are the same. One method of differentiatingthe various drugs in this category is by lipid solubility. It has beendetermined that quaternary ammonium compounds of the class ofanti-cholinergic muscarinic agents having very low lipid solubility aredesired for use within the context of the methods and compoundsdescribed herein. As a result of their low lipophilicity (the ability ofa compound to dissolve in a lipid medium), these molecules tend not tocross the blood/brain barrier as readily as those having higher lipidsolubility. By not crossing this barrier, these compounds do notinterfere with the normal function of acetylcholine in the centralnervous system, nor do they interfere with the beneficial effects ofacetyl-cholinergic inhibitors for the treatment of cognitive impairmentor acute delirium. Further, these low lipid solubility quaternaryammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist drugsameliorate the undesired peripheral effects from the use ofacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors, such as urinary and/or fecalincontinence, nausea, bradychardia, bronchorrhea and bronchospasm.

A benefit of using the anti-cholinergic muscarinic agents of the methodsand compositions described herein is that the maximum dosing of theacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor to effectively treat the cognitivelyimpaired patient can be administered and maintained. Higher doses ofacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors may slow, or stop, the degenerativeprocess through mechanisms that include improved clearance of toxicmolecules.

The quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic agents for use inthe methods described herein are preferably trospium and glycopyrrolate(non-quaternary anti-cholinergic agents include, but are not limited to,oxybutinin, tolterodine, darifenacin and solefenacin). Log P, arecognized parameter proportional to octanol/water partitioningcoefficient, is a standard for measuring comparative solubility of acompound in a lipid compared to water. This is the most importantphysical property that determines whether or not a drug molecule crossesthe blood/brain barrier to interfere with the normal functioning ofacetylcholine in the central nervous system. A low log P valuerepresents low lipid solubility and low probability of crossing theblood/brain barrier. Both glycopyrrolate and trospium have a low log Pbased upon their chemical structure. In contrast, the standardanti-muscarinic drugs in use have a log P value as high as 6.076(tolterodine). Trospium has a log P value of 0.78 and the calculatedlipophilicity of glycopyrrolate is −75.75, thus making them preferredcompounds to achieve the therapeutic goals stated previously within thecontext of the embodiments described herein.

The quaternary ammonium anticholinergic muscarinic agents may beadministered concurrently with any of the various acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitors used to treat cognitive disorders or acute delirium. Suchdrugs include, but are not limited to:

-   -   donepezil    -   rivastigmine    -   galantamine    -   tacrine    -   physostigmine    -   pyridostigmine    -   neostigmine    -   ipidacrine    -   phenserine    -   icopezil    -   zanapezil    -   Ambenonium    -   Edrophonium    -   Huperzine A    -   Ladostigil

In order to treat patients suffering from cognitive impairment or acutedelirium and exhibiting the unwanted adverse effects of excessiveacetylcholine including, but not limited to, urinary and/or fecalincontinence, nausea, bradycardia, bronchorrea, brochospasm, andothostatic hypotension, it is best to combine quaternary ammoniumanti-muscarinic agents with suitable acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors.It is most desirable to administer both classes of drugs intravenouslyor intramuscularly (“parenterally”) or transdermally in patients withacute delirium because these patients are often confused and belligerentand refuse to take oral medications. However, in some cases, oraladministration may be successfully achieved.

There is currently no FDA approved drug treatment for acute delirium.Conventional therapy is with dopamine receptor antagonists, otherwiseknown as antipsychotic medications. Often a patient cannot take such amedication due to a co-existing disease such as Parkinson's Disease, ordue to adverse effects. Studies of routine administration ofacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in addition to haloperidol (anantipsychotic) in intensive care unit patients showed increasedmortality (Maarten M J van Eijk et al, The Lancet, Volume 376, Issue9755, Pages 1829-1837, 27 Nov. 2010, incorporated herein by reference),which is likely related to the untoward effects of these agents in theabsence of the peripheral cholinergic blockade provided by quaternaryammonium anti-muscarinic drugs.

For those patients presently exhibiting symptoms of acute delirium, inwhom acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor therapy is being administered, thedoses are commonly: donepezil: 5-23 mg/day, galantamine: 4-24 mg/day,rivastigmine: 1.5 to 12 mg/day, physostigmine: 0.5 to 2 mg/dayintravenous bolus or up to 10 mcg/minute intravenous infusion.Neostigmine and pyridostigmine have also been used, but dosing is notwell defined. In order to prevent the adverse effects of excessiveacetylcholine, including but not limited to, urinary and/or fecalincontinence, nausea, bradychardia, bronchorrhea and bronchospasm,glycopyrrolate can be administered at the rate of 0.1 to 0.8 mg/dayparenterally or, orally, at the rate of 1 to 8 mg/day. Trospium can beadministered at a rate of 20 mg twice a day, or 60 mg once daily.

For those patients being administered maintenance therapy for delirium,glycopyrrolate is administered concurrently with a conventionalacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor, such as donepezil hydrochloride. Thedosing for glycopyrrolate is about 0.5 to 4 mg twice a day, with adosage of about 1-2 mg twice a day most preferred. The donepezilhydrochloride is administered at a rate of about 5 to 20 mg once a day,with a dosage range of about 5 to 10 mg once a day most preferred.Rivastigmine is dosed at 1.5 to 6 mg twice each day and galantamine at 4to 12 mg twice a day.

The results of various trials using quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergicmuscarinic agents in conjunction with acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitorsare shown below in the following examples.

Example 1 Incontinence Improvement

The patients only identified by numbers below were administered atherapeutically efficacious amount of glycopyrrolate (0.5 mg to 2 mgtwice daily) and monitored for the amount of time indicated.

Patient Time of treatment (months) ′864 10 ′105 7 ′814 7 ′124 8 ′291 8′547 8 ′795 4 ′104 6 ′223 4 ′970 4 ′568 8 ′255 6 ′238 5

Concurrent with the administration of glycopyrrolate, each of thesepatients was able to be treated with the maximum effective dosage (10mg/day) of the acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil, which theywere unable to tolerate before treatment with glycopyrrolate because ofthe presence of the undesired side effects noted above. Theadministration of glycopyrrolate enabled the clinician to administer adosage of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor that provided a measurablecognitive benefit to the patient.

Example 2 Cognitive Function vs. Incontinence

In this trial, patients were administered either of the non-quaternaryammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic agents tolterodine (4 mg/day) oroxybutinin (5-20 mg/day), as indicated. The patients were given aMini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) to determine their cognitivefunction after being treated with either of these two drugs. The MMSE isa conventionally used test with patients suspected of exhibitingcognitive impairment. The MMSE measures an individual's cognitiveability across several domains of cognitive function. It is anacknowledged standard in the medical field and is appropriate forclinical, office based testing. It is scored from 0 to 30, with score of30 indicating normal cognitive function.

These patients were then given a therapeutically efficacious amount ofglycopyrrolate (2 mg/day) in place of the non-quaternary ammonium antimuscarinic agent and evaluated again using the MMSE test. Theirincontinence control was then evaluated and compared against treatmentwith tolterodine or oxybutinin only.

Initial Drue Glycopyrrolate Incontinence Patient (MMSE) (MMSE) Control′864 Tolterodine (14) (18) unchanged ′486 Tolterodine (26) (25) improved′097 Oxybutinin (28) (28) improved ′655 Oxybutinin (23) (22) improved

The patients on the initial lipophilic anti-muscarinic agentstolterodine or oxybutinin exhibited stable cognitive function. When thesame patients received glycopyrrolate, each patient's cognitive functionremained the same, but there was an improvement in three of the foursubjects with respect to urinary incontinence control. The reason forthis is because they were now able to take adequate doses of medicationfor incontinence control which did not precipitate or exacerbate thedeterioration in cognitive functioning.

A larger study evaluated 39 patients having some form of cognitiveimpairment with concurrent urinary incontinence. Their MMSE scoresranged from 13 to 29 prior to being given an acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitor. After administering this drug, their individual MMSE scoreschanged little, as was expected. They were then administered 1 mg twicea day of glycopyrrolate. In 64% of the patients in this group, theirincontinence control improved significantly. Interestingly, incontinencecontrol in 33% of this group declined. It is theorized that since theseindividuals suffered from poor mobility, such as due to hip or legfractures, they simply could not physically reach a rest room facilityin time before becoming incontinent. The incontinence of the remainderof the group remained the same.

Example 3 Rivastigmine with Glycopyrrolate

In this study, six patients with acute delirium were hospitalized andtreated at Rochester (New York) General Hospital.

Patient a) Age 83. Diagnosis: Acute delirium, respiratory failure.Condition severe enough to warrant treatment in Intensive Care Unit(“ICU”). Patient was treated with a combination of rivastigmine (1.5 mgtitrated to 3 mg, orally, twice each day) and glycopyrrolate (1 mg twiceeach day, orally). Her cognitive function improved significantly enoughthat she was to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility uponresolution of her respiratory issues.

Patient b) Age 77. Diagnosis: Acute delirium, urinary incontinence. Upontreatment with 1.5 mg titrated to 3 mg orally, twice a day, withrivastigmine along with 1 mg, twice a day, orally, of glycopyrrolate,the patient's cognitive function improved significantly enough to allowdischarge to a skilled nursing facility.

Patient c) Age 86. Diagnosis: Acute delirium, Parkinson's disease. Aregimen of 1.5 mg titrated to 6 mg, orally, twice each day, ofrivastigmine and 1 mg twice each day, orally, of glycopyrrolate enabledthe patient to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility in arelatively short period of time. The internist and the neurologist hadno more treatment options for this patient and were looking for a longterm placement in a nursing home before the above regime wasadministered, significantly improving his prognosis.

Patient d) Age 78. Diagnosis: Dementia with Lewy bodies, urinaryincontinence. The patient was treated with a regimen of 1.5 mg titratedto 3 mg, orally, twice a day, of rivastigmine and 1 mg twice each dayorally of glycopyrrolate. He showed marked improvement in 24 hours andwas able to be discharge to his own home after 72 hours. Prolongedhospitalization would have been expected in the absence of the abovetreatment protocol.

Patient e) Age 80. Diagnosis: Acute delirium, Parkinson's disease.Patient was placed on a regimen of 1.5 mg titrated to 3 mg, orally,twice a day, of rivastigmine and 1 mg, twice each day, orally, ofglycopyrrolate. Within days she showed a marked improvement in herchoreoathetosis and delirium and was able to be discharged to a skillednursing facility. She subsequently underwent uncomplicated hip surgeryfor a fracture, which would not have been possible without this regimen.

Patient f) Age 87. Diagnosis: Acute delirium, Extrapyramidaldysfunction. Patient was treated with 1.5 mg titrated to 3 mg, orally,twice a day of rivastigmine and 1 mg twice each day, orally, ofglycopyrrolate. After only 2 days the patient showed significantimprovement in cognitive function, cooperation and physical balance. Hisimprovement was so significant that he was discharged to an assistedliving level of care instead of the planned discharge to a skillednursing facility.

Combination Therapy Results in Disease Modification

During the analysis of the results of clinical trials, an interestingand surprising observation was made when the acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibitor rivastigmine was coupled with the quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic agent glycopyrrolate. It was noted thatpatients suffering from various forms of neurodegenerative diseasesrelated to cognitive impairment, such as Alzheimers Disease or Dementiawith Lewy bodies, experienced a marked and prolonged improvement incognitive function, which was uncharacteristic for neurodegenerativeprocesses with this specific combination of drugs. Neurodegenerativediseases routinely progress at disease specific rates and, as mentionedabove, no therapy has been shown to modify the rate of cognitivedecline. The observation was clinically significant. Diseasemodification of neurodegenerative processes has huge social, personaland financial implications in an aging population in the developed anddeveloping countries.

Enhancement of CSF perfusion is a means for enhanced CNS substrateremoval. The identification of pharmacological means of enhancing CSFturnover in the CNS results in reversing, slowing, or modifying thecourse of a neurodegenerative disorder, or a developmental disorder onthe autism spectrum. Specific targets would include, but not be limitedto: beta amyloid, tau, synuclein or any other reputed endogenousmolecules that accumulate inappropriately in the central nervous systemin the setting of a neurodegenerative disorder or developmental disorderon the autism spectrum. Pharmacological interventions should be assessedon their ability to enhance the turnover of CSF and its transit throughthe brain and the clearance of suspected molecules and the clinicalresponse to this enhancement.

Acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors may be used as an example. Currentdoses of acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors are reported to reach only30-40% inhibition of CNS acetylcholine. Higher levels of acetylcholineinhibition are limited by drug-related side effects, which can bemodified by the use of quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinicreceptor antagonists. Preclinical trials could use radiolabeled markersof substances and measure transit time through the central nervoussystem in the presence or absence of high-level acetyl-cholinesteraseinhibition using an acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor and a quaternaryammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist. Monitoring ofCSF through spinal fluid drainage procedures could also chemicallyassess removal of suspect molecules through currently available highlysensitive assays. Studies could be performed in animal models as well ashuman beings, with currently available technology of radiotracers, PETscans and lumbar punctures with highly sensitive assays.

Clinical trials would involve the patients with mild cognitiveimpairment, early-stage Alzheimer's disease, signs of an earlysynuceinopathy (Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavioral Disturbance maypredict Parkinson's disease, Multisystem Atrophy and Dementia with LewyBodies by several decades), and recently identified Autism SpectrumDisorders in children 18 months to 5 years of age. Appropriate markersof disease activity should be measured at baseline and periodicallyduring treatment with high-dose acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors withquaternary ammonium antimuscarinic drug (ACEI-QAAM), including but notlimited to: ADAS (Alzheimer's disease assessment scale), MMSE, FAST,Neuropsychological Testing (Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with LewyBodies, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Multisystem Atrophy), UPDRS(Parkinson's Disease, Dementia with Lewy Bodies, Multisystem Atrophy)and appropriate scales of autistic symptoms and signs. Trials will needto be done for periods of time consistent with the tempo of the diseasecourse, shorter for Dementia with Lewy Bodies, longer for AutismSpectrum Disorders.

Patients treated with acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in combinationwith quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic agents (ACEI-QAAM)(or other substances designed to improve CSF perfusion of the brain) canbe studied for cognitive, affective, and functional improvement overtime. In one preferred embodiment, the acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitoris rivastigmine and the quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinicreceptor antagonist is glycopyrrolate. Emerging side effects areunlikely due to the fact that medications involved in ACEI-QAAM havebeen available and studied for several decades in the United States andother developed countries.

For those patients presently exhibiting symptoms of acute delirium, inwhom acetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor therapy is being administered, theprior art doses are commonly donepezil: 5-23 mg/day, galantamine: 4-24mg/day, rivastigmine: 1.5 to 12 mg/day, physostigmine: 0.5 to 2 mg/dayintravenous bolus or up to 10 mcg/minute intravenous infusion.Neostigmine and pyridostigmine have also been used, but dosing is notwell defined.

In preferred embodiments of the methods described herein, the dosing forglycopyrrolate is about 0.5 to 4 mg twice a day, with a dosage of about1-2 mg twice a day most preferred. Trospium is preferably administeredat a rate of 20 mg twice a day or 60 mg of an extended releaseformulation once daily. Donepezil hydrochloride is administered at arate of about 2 to 23 mg once a day, with a dosage range of about 5 to10 mg once a day most preferred. Rivastigmine is dosed at 1.5 to 24 mgtwice orally each day and galantamine at 4 to 12 mg twice a day.

In patients with cognitive disorders or other neurodegenerative diseasesbeing treated with ACEI-QAAM, higher doses of all theacetylcholinesterase inhibitors are tolerated at at least four times theusual monotherapy dose. For rivastigmine, the maximum monotherapy dosein the US is currently 12 mg/day orally or 9.5 mg/day transdermally (theFDA recently approved the use of 13.5 mg/day transdermally, but themaximum orally approved dose is still 12 mg/day). In preferredembodiments, dosages up to 48 mg/day orally or 54 mg/day transdermallyare preferably used. In one preferred embodiment, the daily dosage ofthe combination therapy is rivastigmine at 24 mg/day (or 19 mgtransdermally) in combination with 2 mg of glycopyrrolate twice daily bymouth.

In one preferred embodiment, for patients presently exhibiting symptomsof dementia with Lewy bodies, a combination of rivastigmine andglycopyrrolate are administered to the patient. In one preferredembodiment, a minimum of 12 mg to 24 mg/day of rivastigmine isadministered, either orally or transdermally. In a further preferredembodiment, a minimum of 19 mg to 24 mg/day of rivastigmine isadministered. In another preferred embodiment, a minimum of 24 mg/day ofrivastigmine is administered. In preferred embodiments, dosages up to 48mg/day orally or 54 mg/day transdermally of rivastigmine are used. Inone preferred embodiment, glycopyrrolate can be administered at the rateof 0.1 to 0.8 mg/day parenterally, or, orally, at the rate of 1 to 8mg/day. In a further preferred embodiment, 1-2 mg of glycopyrrolate isadministered, orally, twice a day.

For those patients being administered therapy for other cognitivedisorders, including but not limited to, mild cognitive impairment,Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Multisystem Atrophy, Dementiawith Lewy Bodies, Frontotemporal Dementia, Progressive SupranuclearPalsy, Vascular Dementia, as well as those with biomarker andradiographic defined risks of developing such diseases, and AutismSpectrum Disorder, in one preferred embodiment, rivastigmine andglycopyrrolate are administered to the patient. In one preferredembodiment, a minimum of 12 mg to 24 mg/day of rivastigmine isadministered, either orally or transdermally. In a further preferredembodiment, a minimum of 19 mg to 24 mg/day of rivastigmine isadministered. In a further preferred embodiment, a minimum of 24 mg/dayof rivastigmine is administered. In preferred embodiments, dosages up to48 mg/day orally or 54 mg/day transdermally of rivastigmine are used. Inone preferred embodiment, glycopyrrolate can be administered at the rateof 0.1 to 0.8 mg/day parenterally or, orally, at the rate of 1 to 8mg/day. In a further preferred embodiment, 1-2 mg of glycopyrrolate isadministered, orally, twice a day.

Data available with patients who have been treated withacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic agents for Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB)provide evidence of a disease modifying effect of this combinationtherapy.

The element of an acceptable reliable means of disease modification forneurodegenerative processes and Autism Spectrum Disorders based uponclearance of disadvantageous endogenous molecules by enhancing the CSFclearing mechanism through pharmacological means can be combined withmechanisms for screening and early diagnosis of such disorders. Theresultant decline in the burden of neurodegenerative and undefinabledevelopmental disorders will have significant economic potential for asponsor, as well as significant social, medical, and economic benefitsfor society.

Example Rivastigmine with Glycopyrrolate in Patients with Dementia withLewy Bodies

Data available with patients who have been treated withacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitors in combination with quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic agents for Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB)provide evidence of a disease modifying effect. Dementia with LewyBodies is a progressive dementing disease with some features ofParkinsonism. It progresses faster than Alzheimer's Disease and providesan opportunity to observe a change in the deterioration of cognitiveability over time (Olichney J M et al. “Cognitive Decline is Faster inLewy Body Variant than in Alzheimer's Disease”. Neurology 1998; 51(2)351, herein incorporated by reference).

Three patients were treated with the maximally tolerated dose of anacetyl-cholinesterase inhibitor, in this case, rivastigmine, incombination with 1-2 mg of glycopyrrolate administered orally twicedaily to avoid side effects. This resulted in doses that were at leasttwice the maximum FDA approved top dose of oral or transdermalrivastigmine. The Mini-Mental State Examination, a standardized, rapidcognitive assessment that is widely used in clinical practice, was usedto test the patients' cognitive ability over time.

Patient 1:

K M was a 65 year old woman with new onset of dementia with Lewy Bodieswhen she began treatment. She was treated with 24 mg/day of oralrivastigmine in combination with 1 mg of glycopyrrolate orally twice aday.

FIG. 1 compares the expected (100) results of the MMSE test for apatient with new onset of dementia with Lewy Bodies with the actual(150) MMSE test results for patient K M. The x-axis shows the number ofmonths of treatment. When patient K M began treatment, her MMSE scorewas 16, below the expected score for MMSE at the onset of dementia withLewy bodies. During the third month after treatment, K M's MMSE scoreincreased to 30 (the highest score for the MMSE), and continued to bebetween approximately 28 and 30 for the remainder of the 36 month periodshown in the figure. In comparison, the expected MMSE score atapproximately 21 months is 15, and at the 35 month mark is less than 10.This is a remarkable improvement in cognitive function, and indicatesthat the combination treatment has dramatically slowed the progressionof the disease. At the time of initiation of therapy, the patient wasplanning to be placed in a skilled nursing facility (a nursing home),but she currently resides in the community with her husband withoutadditional assistance.

Patient 2:

A L was a 65 year old man with one year of symptoms of dementia withLewy Bodies prior to the combination treatment. A L was treated with 19mg/day of rivastigmine transdermally once daily in combination with 2 mgglycopyrrolate two times a day.

FIG. 2 compares the expected (200) results of the MMSE test based on AL's MMSE score at the beginning of his treatment for dementia with LewyBodies with the actual (250) MMSE test results for patient A L. Thex-axis shows the number of months of treatment. When patient A L begantreatment, his MMSE score was 27. A L's score remained between 26 and 30during the 36 month period shown in the figure. In comparison, theexpected MMSE score at approximately 21 months is 15, and at the 35month mark is less than 10. This is a remarkable improvement incognitive function, and indicates that the combination treatment hasdramatically slowed the progression of the disease. This patient wasexpected to need nursing home care, and was being considered for hospicecare at one point. He resides in the community with his wife, andvacations in Florida during the winter.

Patient 3:

R F was a 57 year old man when treatment was initiated. At the timetreatment was initiated, R F had been showing symptoms of dementia withLewy Bodies for two years.

FIG. 3 shows that R F's actual (350) MMSE scores over a 29 month periodconsistently exceeded the expected (300) MMSE scores. R F experiencedclinical improvement when the treatment was initiated. For example, at11 months, the expected MMSE score is approximately 20, and R F's scorewas approximately 28. Between 20 and 28 months, R F's scores fluctuatedbetween 16 and 18, while the expected progression would be a decrease inthe MMSE score from 15 to 11 during that time period. While R F had aclinical response to the treatment, it is unclear whether there was areal change in the underlying disease process. One reason for thispotential difference in outcome includes an earlier age of onset (whichmay indicate a different mechanism underlying the disease). In addition,R F had previously abused alcohol, and may have been exposed toorganophosphonate insecticides during his employment at a lawn carecompany. Such chemicals are an epidemiological risk for Parkinson'sdisease, which is another Lewy Body disorder. Despite these additionalobstacles, patient R F clearly had symptomatic improvement. Patientswith a history similar to R F's history may need higher doses ofacetylcholinesterase inhibitors to get disease modification.

The patients' MMSE scores in FIGS. 1-3 over two to three years are shownin the figures compared to the published rate of expected decline(Olichney J M et al. “Cognitive Decline is Faster in Lewy Body Variantthan in Alzheimer's Disease”. Neurology 1998; 51 (2)351). There is notreatment for Dementia with Lewy Bodies, and the rate of expecteddecline is based on no treatment.

In addition to the measured scores, all three patients (K M, A L, and RF) have remained in the community living at home with spouses.Institutionalization was recommended prior to treatment for K M and A L.

Rates of institutionalization have been reported to be higher fordementia with Lewy bodies than for Alzheimer's Disease. (Olichney J M etal. “Cognitive Decline is Faster in Lewy Body Variant than inAlzheimer's Disease”. Neurology 1998; 51 (2)351). Survival afterdiagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies is also reported to be shorterfor patients with Dementia with Lewy Bodies compared to Alzheimer'sDisease (Williams M M et al., “Survival and mortality differencesbetween dementia with Lewy bodies vs Alzheimer disease”. Neurology.2006; 67(11):1935; Lopez O L et al., “Predictors of progression inpatients with AD and Lewy bodies”, Neurology. 2000; 54(9):1774, bothincorporated herein by reference).

Dementia with Lewy Bodies progresses faster that Alzheimer's Disease,which is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia. Theconstellation of symptoms in dementia with Lewy Bodies includes vividhallucinations, falling, precipitous drops in blood pressure and rapidfluctuations. The patients are usually intolerant of drugs used forpsychosis. They have variable moods with a predisposition to depression.They have varying degrees of symptoms similar to Parkinson's disease.This results in a higher rate of institutionalization than with otherdementia. The affective, functional and cognitive stability over time,as measured by MMSE and the ability to remain in a community dwelling,in this devastating disease indicates that the treatment is modifyingthe course of the underlying disease, and not merely treating symptoms.

Alternative Formulations for Glycopyrrolate

Currently available quaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinicreceptor antagonists compositions occur as a salt, with the quaternaryammonium cation and a non-organic anion.

In preferred embodiments of the present invention, a quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist includes a saltcomprising an organic lipophilic anion as an anionic component of thesalt. In some preferred embodiments, the lipophilic anion of thequaternary ammonium anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonistpreferably includes a fatty acid including at least eight carbonmolecules. In some preferred embodiments, the quaternary ammoniumanti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor antagonist is glycopyrrolate ortrospium.

The quaternary ammonium antimuscarinic drugs (QAAM) are particularlyuseful because of their ability to antagonize endogenous acetylcholineduring periods of excessive acetylcholine production, or prolongedacetylcholine affect from physiologic and pharmacologic reasons. Thesecompounds share the property that they do not appreciably penetrate thecentral nervous system (CNS), and glycopyrrolate bromide and trospiumchloride have been particularly useful in treating patients in need of aperipheral anticholinergic effect on antimuscarinic receptors.

The same biochemical property that is advantageous in preventing CNSdistribution, also limits intestinal absorption, requiring the currentlyavailable formulations of these medications to be taken in the absenceof food, and resulting in incomplete and variable bioavailability inpatients.

Glycopyrrolate hydrobromide is a quaternary ammonium salt with thechemical name of 3[(cyclopentylhydroxyphenylacetyl)oxy]-1,1-dimethylpyrrolidinium bromide, a molecular formula of C₁₉H₂₈BrNO₃ and amolecular weight of 398.33.

Trospium chloride is a quaternary ammonium salt with the chemical nameof Spiro [8-azoniabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-8,r-pyrrolidinium],3-[(hydroxydiphenylacetyl)oxy]-, chloride, (1α, 3β, 5α). The molecularformula of trospium chloride is C₂₅H₃₀ClNO₃ and its molecular weight is427.97.

Enhancing the oral bioavailability of glycopyrrolate, trospium, andother QAAMs allows for administration of the medication without regardto food, and possibly without regard to other medications. It would alsodecrease the inter-subject variability in effect of the medication andreduce the effect of changes in gastrointestinal motility on drugabsorption, because the degree of variability between patients isdirectly proportional to the time it takes to absorb a medication.

A QAAM is produced with a lipophilic anion as the anionic component of asalt. Structure activity analysis (SAR) suggests that an optimumlipophilic anion would be a fatty acid of at least 8 carbon molecules,so that the hydrophobic tail of the molecules would provide enhancedlipid solubility to counteract the positive charge of the ionizedcationic QAAM molecule. In some preferred embodiments, the appropriatesalts come from a family of medium and long chain fatty acids including,but not limited to: arachnic acid, stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleicacid, erucic acid, linoleic acid, arachidonic acid, or myristic acid.

The salt of the QAAM (cation) and the fatty acid (anion) can be producedthrough a common organic chemistry reaction referred to as “ionswapping”. In such a reaction, the QAAM compound as the currentelemental salt (glycopyrrolate hydrobromide, trospium chloride) isplaced in solution with the elemental salt of a 3 fatty acid such aslinolenic acid. The solution is subjected to variations in temperature,pH and agitation to produce an insoluble salt but is precipitated andcollected as the supernatant fluid is removed. The precipitated salt isharvested, qualitatively and quantitatively identified and thenstoichiometrically administered to animals. Quantitative serum and/orurine assays are used to make comparisons with the elemental salt of theQAAM, both in the presence and absence of food. Intravenousadministration of the QAAM (example: glycopyrrolate) with quantitativeserum and/or urine assay can be used as a reference standard for 100%bioavailability, and both the native compound and the synthesized saltare compared against this to establish their relative bioavailability inthe presence and absence of food and other commonly co-administeredmedications.

In addition to the bioavailability studies mentioned above, qualitystudies would need to be done during the process to make sure there isno hydrolysis of the QAAM molecule in the process.

The synthesized fatty acids/QAAM salt are useful as an individualproduct for the treatment of various diseases involving excessiveacetylcholine activity in humans and animals, whether these are producedby a pathologic process or the use of a medication (including but notlimited to: overactive bladder, sialorrhea, diarrhea, bradycardia,hyperhidrosis, overactive gastric secretion, dumping syndrome,bronchospasm, vasomotor rhinitis). Enhanced bioavailablity QAAM shouldbe able to improve symptoms without causing significant central nervoussystem anti-cholinergic toxicity. Enhanced bioavailability allows foradministration without regard to food, and may also allow fortransdermal absorption to be enhanced to the level that transdermalformulations of this product would be practical. This could also be usedin combination with acetylcholinesterase inhibiting drugs, or any otherdrug that increases acetylcholine tone.

Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of theinvention herein described are merely illustrative of the application ofthe principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of theillustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of theclaims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential tothe invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for altering a disease progression ofdementia with Lewy Bodies comprising administering to a patient atherapeutic amount of glycopyrrolate and a therapeutic amount ofrivastigmine.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disease progressionis altered by slowing the progression of dementia with Lowy Bodiescompared to disease progression in patients am treated withglycopyrrolate and rivastigmine.
 3. A method for altering a diseaseprogression of a cognitive disorder selected from the group consistingof Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Lewy Bodies, Parkinson's Disease,Fronto-temporal dementia, and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, comprisingadministering to a patient a therapeutic amount of glycopyrrolate and atherapeutic amount of rivastigmine.
 4. The method of claim 3, whereinthe disease progression is altered by slowing the progression of thedisease compared to disease progression in patients not treated withrivastigmine and glycopyrrolate.
 5. The method of claim 3, comprisingadministering a minimum of about 2-4 mg/day of glycopyrrolate and aminimum of about 12-48 mg/day of rivastigmine to the patient.
 6. Themethod of claim 3, comprising administering a minimum of about 12 mg/dayorally or a minimum of about 9.5 mg/day transdermally of rivastigmine tothe patient.
 7. The method of claim 3, comprising administering betweenabout 24 and about 48 mg/day orally or administering between about 19 mgand 54 mg transdermally of rivastigmine to the patient.
 8. The method ofclaim 3, wherein an efficacious therapeutic amount of glycopyrrolate isadministered to the patient either orally, intravenously orparenterally.
 9. The method of claim 3, wherein the therapeutic amountof rivastigmine is administered to the patient either orally ortransdermally.